global investment strategy, market timing, technical research service, david fuller Subscribe Contact Us

fullermoney.com :
Subscriber Login:

Remember Me

I listen to the downloads while walking the dogs!!!!! Mondays without the Friday longer term outlook would be grim indeed!
P.H. 10 Sep 2010
Many thanks for the great service - I particularly enjoy the Friday Audio which I usually listen to in the car over the weekend.
T.M. 3 Nov 2011
Dear David, I used to be a subscriber via work but through 2008 services were cut. I personally subscribed a few weeks ago. Great to hear your dulcet tones again on the audio! PS. Thanks for the advice on the Swissy from the Audio. I played the breakout beautifully.
S.H. 14 Sep 2011
As a new student of the UK market your commentary is essential in keeping perspective.
G.B. 22 Nov 2009
Your comments about Tim Price's piece, in Wenesday's Comment, really struck a chord with me. It's taken me many years to reach the same conclusion that I cannot control the political climate but I can choose and control how I relate to it and I choose to concentrate on my family's financial security. This is an area where I feel I have some degree of control and your service has certainly contributed to that end.
R.P. 12 Jan 2012
I am very pleased to be a full subscriber--I have spent too long reading between the lines and not getting involved. I look forward with great expectations to getting more involved next year. Your insights and observations are exceptional and I now believe essential for me. Keep up the good work.

J.S. 05/12/2009
Having just renewed my annual subscription again, I wished to thank you both for your exceptional guidance during this sometimes perplexing bull run, and your highlighting of numerous opportunities in shares, commodities and particularly precious metals. It's much appreciated.

J.F. 3 Dec 2009
As a relatively longtime subscriber, I must commend both of you on the consistency of excellence delivered through your service.
R.P. 9 Aug 2011
It is the eve of my thirteenth year as a subscriber and may I say how grateful I am to both of you for providing a consisent voice of reason and insight during the many ups and down over this period.
G.S. 31 Dec 2012
I started working in 1972 and I saw Mr David Fuller during my stage in London in 1976. So I am following Fullermoney quite a long time and I do appreciate every day all comments and charts.
D.R. 18 Dec 2012
May I congratulate you both on steering the Fullermoney ship so calmly through the recent choppy financial seas. It is at times like this that the less experienced investors really appreciate your seasoned perspective.
G.Y. 7 Dec 2011
More testimonials from our subscribers
Generating first-rate investment advice since 1947.

The Fullermoney Global Strategy Service

Our theme: Empowerment Through Knowledge

Sign up for free daily comment


David Fuller and Eoin Treacy's Free (Abbreviated) Comment of the Day. 
The more-detailed Subscriber's Comment of the Day becomes available for public access after 4 months.
Click here to see the most recent free Subscriber's Comment from February 2013.
Subscribe today - click here for details.
Next Item  Print this Item  Email this Item  

Wednesday 3rd December 2008

Tim Price: Considering the snow - This issue from PFP Wealth Management discusses 'The Snowball: Warren Buffett and the business of life', by Alice Schroeder. Here is a section:

Aspirant financiers and entrepreneurs seeking the Value Way to Riches will be well served by the shareholders? letters alone. "The Snowball? fills in both the private and public history of America's greatest investor. What strikes the reader of today is the extent to which the current deep crisis has its roots in the behaviour of bankers ten and twenty years ago - the Credit Crunch and Banking Fiasco of 2008 did not come out of a clear blue sky. The full dress rehearsal for the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers in 2008 - probably the worst decision made by the US Treasury and Federal Reserve so far, in an environment where the swirl of poor decisions has been as thick as autumn leaves - came in 1991 when Salomon Brothers was hours away from bankruptcy following a hushed-up fraud involving rigged auctions for US Treasury bonds. Buffett was parachuted in as chairman to save the firm, and perhaps even the integrity of the US financial system. So "too big to fail" is hardly a contemporary coinage. And the festival of moral hazard that is the current Anglo-Saxon banking culture has its origins in the 1998 collapse of Long-Term Capital Management and its vilely hubristic executives. Buffett was invited to rescue the fund. But its management, in what might be seen as an eerie presentiment of the downfall of Lehman's CEO Dick Fuld, were determined to retain ownership and control of the business. Alice Schroeder asks the pertinent question of the Fed-orchestrated LTCM bailout:

"It is hard to overstate the significance of a central-bank-led rescue of a private money manager. If a hedge fund, however large, was too big to fail, then what large financial institution would ever be allowed to collapse? The government risked becoming the margin of safety. No serious consequences had come about in the end from the derivatives near-meltdown. The market afterward seemed to behave as if no serious consequences ever could. This threat, the so-called "moral hazard," was a chronic worry of regulators."

Buffett himself candidly explained the second- and third-order impact of failing derivative structures, which again carries huge resonance in our dislocated modern financial arena:

"Derivatives are like sex. It's not who we're sleeping with, it's who they're sleeping with that's the problem."

Much of "The Snowball? has a grim relevance to current events:

"Terrorists have a huge advantage. They pick the time, the place, and the means. It's very difficult to defend against fanatics.. This [the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001] is just the start of things. We don't know who our enemy is. Now, it's us versus a shadow. There could be many shadows."

And like the shareholders? letters, "The Snowball? is a repository of fine quotations, about business and investment success, and much else. But as we crouch in the aftermath of the Crash of 2008, amidst the rubble of the equity and credit markets, there is specific cause to see optimism and a sense of opportunity in Warren Buffett's words describing a previous panic (in this case, the crisis of confidence in the financial markets post-Enron). As Alice Schroeder puts it,

"Berkshire's best opportunities always came at times of uncertainty, when others lacked the insight, resources, and fortitude to make the right judgments and commit."

But Buffett tells it best, and the advice resonates for our time as well as in relation to his previous market coups:

"Cash combined with courage in a crisis is priceless."

My view - This quote immediately above, selected by Tim Price, is particularly apt. When a crisis appears all but insurmountable, it is usually well discounted.

'The Snowball' should make a good present for the forthcoming holiday season.


Email of the day (1) - On our site and equity outlook:

"It is always pleasure to get to read insightful independent thoughts from our community on our site. Pl note I call it as our site...

"I am from India and have spent close to 17 years in equities. I just want to bring to notice two crucial facts:

a. all bear markets bottom with a mishap
b. all bull markets start amidst a war...

"I am sensing that the current situation in Mumbai is giving us similar signals and we might just be fishing the bottom at this stage...

"I am attaching herewith a good piece from Stratfor which highlights possibilities of the scenario as it sets to develop over the next few days, weeks or months...

"What is your take on the situation...as always would keen to get your words of wisdom..."

My comment - Absolutely we think of Fullermoney as your site (as in the Collectives'). Eoin and I know that the service would be much diminished without the insightful comments, articles and reports that we receive from Subscriber's. Long may this last.

On your point (a), I do think some economic situations become sufficiently worrying to provoke an even more dramatic policy response, and expect it to happen this time.

On point (b), there are precedents, but I suggest that the 2003-2006 bull-run was delayed until the invasion of Iraq had commenced and met minimal opposition, initially. I have great sympathy with the citizens of Mumbai and obviously emotions there run high. However as you will know, the president of Pakistan, Asif Ali Zardari, is also a victim of terrorism following the assassination of his wife, Benazir Bhutto, last December. Even though his ability to control the terrorists and eliminate their bases must be limited, India may have more success if the current government is on their side. I sincerely hope there is no likelihood of another war, although the problem of Kashmir is far from resolved. Assuming there is no serious conflict between India and Pakistan, I expect your country to be among the leaders of the next upturn.


Richard Lambert: Media help deepen crisis, says CBI chief - Fewer people might take this item seriously if the comments had not come from a former editor of the Financial Times, and appeared in the same paper today. Here is the opening:

Richard Lambert, director general of the CBI employers' body, yesterday launched an attack on the press watchdog for failing to crack down on reporting that had served to deepen the financial crisis.

He said unsubstantiated rumours had been spread about institutions in trouble and that the Press Complaints Commission should have issued guidelines to business journalists on the importance of accurate information in such uncertain times.

Instead, there had been stories that had alarmed savers with melodramatic language, unsourced quotes and suggestions that problems in one institution were spreading to others.

"At a time when careless headlines or injudicious reporting risk becoming self-fulfilling prophecies of a very serious nature, you might have thought that the industry's self-regulatory body . . . would have had some guidance to offer about the special responsibilities of business journalists as they pick their way through the dangerous minefields of the credit crunch.

"But of course the PCC is nowhere to be seen in this drama."

Mr Lambert, a former editor of the Financial Times, said crisis management had become more difficult because of changes in the way the City worked and in the culture of the business media that reported it.

My view - This is a delicate subject. We have a free press, which is essential for any open and vibrant society, but freedom is best assured when it is accompanied by responsibility.

No one is calling for Pollyannaish stories in an economic crisis or cheerleading from those with vested interests. However there is an old adage: 'Fear sells.' Readers will have their own views as to whether there is sometimes an element of gratuitous gloom in headlines or a surfeit of articles focusing on everything that might possibly go bump in the night.

Journalists can be as emotional as the rest of us, and one of their functions is to be a mirror of our fears and expectations. My own view is that the serious press is responsible and that we are generally well served.


My personal portfolio: BRWM trading long partially stopped out, silver long increased -
Half of my trading long in the BlackRock World Mining Trust was stopped out yesterday. Consequently a March position was sold at 219.7p against my purchase at 221.8p on 24th November. Using the Baby Steps approach, I doubled my small long position in silver today, paying $9.705 for another March position. These prices include spread-bet dealing costs.


Bill Gross: Dow 5,000 Redux -
My thanks to a subscriber for this interesting report published by PIMCO. Here is the refreshingly self-deprecatory opening:

Here I go again! Gosh it was only six years ago that I cemented my place in stock market history by predicting that the Dow would fall from 8,500 to 5,000, instead of going up to 14,000 where it peaked in October of 2007. Well, I could use the standard set of excuses: 1) No one else saw it coming, 2) I was misinterpreted, and taken out of context, 3) I was tired, overworked, and had family problems, or 4) I had just come out of rehab. But these days what really works is a full confession. I mean, like, uh, it was totally my fault and I take full responsibility. The fact is I was only off by 9,000 points. That's my story, and I'm stickin' to it.

Well, fools rush in. This time though I'm definitely older and maybe a little bit wiser. No magic number, nor a specific target date from the Swami of the Dow. This one will be more conceptual, but still present a "take" that you can criticize or damn with faint praise. And no, despite the title, it doesn't imply that the stock market is headed to 5,000 and that I was always right or just a little bit early. It only suggests that I'm readdressing the critical topic of equity valuation - that mysterious fragile flower where price is part perception, part valuation, and part hope or lack thereof. Press on, Swami.

Let me first announce a fundamental premise with which I think all rational investors would agree: I believe in stocks for the long run - but only if purchased at the right price. That statement packs a real punch. It says that capitalism is and will remain a going concern, that risk-taking - over the long run - will be rewarded, but only from a starting price that correctly anticipates the economy's growth and its share of after-tax corporate profits within it. Acknowledging the above, let's look at a few basic standards of valuation that historically have stood the test of time, to see if at least the price is right.

One of them is what is known as the "Q" ratio, or the value of the stock market relative to the replacement cost of net assets. The basic logic behind "Q" is that capitalism works. If the "Q" is above 1.0, then the market is valuing a company at more than it costs to reproduce it; stock prices should fall. If it is below 1.0, then stocks are undervalued because new businesses can't be created at as cheap a price as they can be bought in the open market. In the short run, this ratio is volatile as shown below but it tends to be mean reverting, which is critical. As long as capitalism is a going concern, "Q" should mean revert to 1.0. If so, then oh, oh what a "Q"! Today's Q ratio has almost never been lower and certainly not since WWII, implying extreme undervaluation, as seen in Chart 1.

My view - The Q Ratio is certainly at an interesting level but what of Bill Gross' concluding four points?

Corporate profits - I assume that the outlook is diabolical through at least 2Q 2009, and that a great deal of this is factored into today's share prices. The longer-term points cited by Bill Gross are a concern for US equities but policies in a Democratically-dominated Washington will not necessarily be repeated in Asian-led emerging markets.

Globalization's salutary growth rate - These are interesting points and we can only guess as to how it will play out. Protectionism is always a risk, especially in an economic downturn, but I think the attractions of globalisation are well understood by most governments. I have often wondered if Asia would be less willing to fund the USA's deficits, but their holdings in US Treasuries have done extremely well recently, due to falling yields and a stronger dollar.

Animal spirits - These are part of human nature and I am optimistic that they will return, although hopefully on a healthier basis, meaning less cowboy capitalism.

The benevolent fist of government - Usually, this is less onerous in developing economies, which I expect to outperform OECD countries once again.


Email of the day (2) - On compensation regarding spread-betting accounts:

"I refer to the e-mail of the day on 27 November on the above subject. I trust you will advise us further, once you are able to ascertain the compensation available, if the spread betting company was to go bust."

My comment - I promised that I would follow up, particularly regarding IG Index, which has recently reported potential bad debts of £15 million due to clients unable to meet margin calls.

I spoke to Chris De La Vega (christopher.delavega@igindex.co.uk) of IG, who is my account manager, although I deal online. He has always been helpful and provided two links to their website. This first link will tell you about the firm. This second link confirms compensation limits.

IG Group is a listed company in the UK, pays a 5.58% dividend at current prices and with no debt has an infinitely stronger balance sheet than all those banks which have so concerned us.

Incidentally, I was offered 10% of all commissions generated by any clients whom I introduced to the firm. I thanked them for the offer but explained that by longstanding policy agreement, neither Fullermoney nor any of our associates ever receives any commissions or other forms of remuneration for services mentioned on this site. To do so, would in our view, compromise our objectivity and potentially create a conflict of interests in terms of our relationships with our subscribers.

However, subscribers should be aware that revenue sharing has always been commonplace in the financial sector. Therefore, when any financial service is recommended to you, it may not be a bad idea to enquire if that person or their firm has a financial incentive in making the recommendation.



Additional Commentary by Eoin Treacy

Asia ex Japan: The Valuation Inquisition -  The MSCI Asia Pacific ex-Japan Index soared from its 2001 lows to the highs posted late last year, in what had been a very consistent uptrend that accelerated towards the peak. The Index lost 67% of its peak value before finding at least short-term support near 200 in late October. When we compare the Index's Price / Book ratio with the price chart, we see that extreme lows for the ratio correspond with important market lows.

In the past, periods which have seen such enormous sell-offs are generally good buying opportunities if one is willing to look past the short term. Given the size and speed of the decline, base formation development is needed before the market can sustain more than a technical rally. The question now is whether this already taking place; with the downtrend having lost momentum and a sustained move below 200 needed to question scope for further higher to lateral ranging.


Fixed Income Investor: Bond of the Week - Thanks to colleague Mark Glowrey for forwarding his latest fixed income comment, which this week focuses on Gilts. Here is a section:

This year, the majority of the action in the Gilt market has been in the shorter-dated end. Investors have flocked to the security of government-guaranteed debt to protect their capital, egged on by the prospect of even lower interest rates.

The impact on the shorter end of the curve* has been dramatic. The flood of money into 1 to 5 year maturity gilts has bid up prices, forcing down the yields on these fixed coupon securities. The benchmark 5.75% Dec 2009 issue, which has just one year to run to maturity, has gained over 4 points in price terms from its lows back in June, and now yields a less-than-generous 1.3% to maturity.

The longer dated end of the curve, however, has been somewhat of a Cinderella. Investors have preferred the security of shorter dated maturities, which ensure a relatively quick return of capital, rather than risk locking up their funds for ten years or more. There is also the nagging uncertainty of inflation coming back to haunt us in the future, which would severely impact longer dated bonds.

The last few days have seen longer dated Gilts start to play catch-up. Prices for 10 and 30 year US Treasuries and the 30yr German BUXL have soared, and well-known (and top performing) hedge fund manager Hugh Hendry has been widely quoted in the press stating that he is buying the undated 3.5% War Loan bond for his own personal portfolio.

We would be inclined to agree with Mr Hendry. A study of the chart of War Loan (see right) shows that this instrument displays clear range-trading characteristics. This year's range has until recently been constrained between 71 and 80, but the last few days have seen the resistance taken out, opening the door for a potential rally up to the 2006 highs above 90.

At this morning's mid price of 86.5, the running yield on War Loan can be calculated as 3.5%x100/86.5= 4.0%. This does not seem unreasonable given that base rates now stand at 3.5%, and are set to go lower.


My view - Government bonds of all maturities are receiving considerable inflows as investors shun other asset classes and move increasingly large amounts of cash into the security of government backed instruments. With yields on three-month US Treasuries yielding almost nothing and low readings also being posted by a number of other countries' short-term debt; investors are increasingly looking to longer maturities in order to get some return on their investment.

There are two ways of looking at the market for 30-year Gilts, mentioned in another part of the above piece: One can't but identify the obvious acceleration and be wary that this trend is quite overextended. The flight to quality has been remarkably swift and investors are experiencing unusually high levels of fear. Being objective about the chart action, the accelerations are eyebrow raising but there is no sign yet that they are over. However, considering the extent of the move, a trailing stop might be advisable. .

The other view is that UK interest rates are expected to come significantly lower over the coming months and on a commonality basis US, European and Canadian 30yr yields have all already broken to new lows. The UK 30yr yield has been relatively steady by comparison, but could now be partaking in a catch-up move. An upward dynamic would be needed to check downward momentum beyond a brief pause.


Email of the day (1) - on the medium to longer-term outlook for bonds:

"I see, interestingly, bonds yields continue to decline due I suppose to huge risk aversion, safe haven flows, a guarantee that you will get your money back, deflationary fears, de-leveraging, capital flight from emerging markets, CDS levels on corporate debt and now the prospect that the fed will buy the Treasuries own bonds.

"However one would have thought yields would rise with the excessive supply coming on the market in 2009. Not so obviously looking at the charts.. What gives...

"What will China and other emerging countries with current account surpluses make of this game? Will they look for higher yields on new bonds or be happy the value of the existing bonds they are holding is appreciating."

My comment - Thank you for these interesting questions which I'm sure other subscribers are also asking. Of all the valid reasons you mention above we can also add the prospect of lower interest rates, not least in the UK and Europe.

The fear for fixed income investors is that the current recession turns into a damaging deflationary spiral such as that experienced by Japan in the 1990s. Japanese 10yr yields fell to a low near 0.77% in 1998 and while they posted even more extreme levels in 2003, they have ranged between 1 and 2% for a decade. Japan continues to experience anaemic growth and little or no inflation. Could the USA, UK and Europe follow a similar pattern?

Bond markets are certainly being re-priced to allow for this possibility and the word 'depression' is being thrown around willy nilly as if it were a certainty. The power of this contention is that its proponents can point to Japan as an example and rationalise that government bonds are cheap even at these elevated levels.

They might be right in predicting that government bond prices can still go higher in the short to medium-term. However, the Japanese example is different from the current situation because the policy response has been implemented much quicker and is far more wide ranging than any initial move to prevent the Japanese deflation. Policy makers can also look to the Japanese example and learn from past mistakes. However, there is no short-term solution. It could be a number of years before Western central banks can declare victory in their efforts to stem the deflationary threat. Considering, the quantity of cash been printed, it is hard to imagine that the seeds of the next inflationary cycle, which is some years away, are not now being sown.

Asian governments have been buying Treasuries over the last decade as a safe haven for their national savings and in the process, have helped to fund consumption in the USA. Net Foreign Transactions into the USA are still considerable but are declining; suggesting foreigners are buying less US securities. It is too early to say whether this will turn into a more prolonged trend but anecdotally, we also hear that China and other Asian economies are spending more money at home in order to support their domestic economies. There will still be a need for AAA rated government securities but at such low yields, better long-term returns are likely to be found in other assets.


Today's interesting charts -
The Chart Library has two Search Engines. One searches the more than 17,000 equities, funds and ETFs in the International Equity Library. The other searches through the rest of the Chart Library for indices, commodities, currencies bond prices and yields, ratios, spreads and overlays. You can also customise these charts and save any of them in your Favourites section. Check the Library's Help section for further details.

Shanghai A-Share Index - this market continues to show more evidence of base development than others and would need to sustain a move below 1750 to question potential for some additional support building around current levels.

South Africa - continues to range above 18,000 and would need to sustain a move below that level to reaffirm the downtrend.

Oil - remains in a consistent, albeit increasingly overextended downtrend and a clear upward dynamic is needed to question scope for some additional downside.


Email of the day (2, 3 & 4) -
on additions to the Chart Library:

"At your earliest convenience, please add the following to the chart library:
CGM Focus (CGMFX). This fund is managed by Capital Growth Management in the USA."

And

"Please add Impax Environmental Markets plc (IEM) to your chart library (it is a "fund", actually a closed end investment company), thanks."

And

"Could you please add the Mortgage Finance index (MFX) to the library?"

My comment - Thank you for these interesting suggestions which have now been added to the Chart Library.

 

 



Next Item  Print this Item  Email this Item  

Click here to receive David Fuller's Free Comment of the Day by email.
Subscribe to the Fullermoney Global Strategy Service.


Access to our research services requires acceptance of our Terms of Business and is subject to our Disclaimer. This website is © 2008-2010 Stockcube plc. All rights reserved. Click here to view our Privacy Policy. Fullermoney is a division of Stockcube Research Ltd authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.
Access to our research services requires acceptance of our Terms of Business and is subject to our Disclaimer. www.fullermoney.com is © 2004 Stockcube plc. All rights reserved. Please view our Privacy Policy. Fullermoney is a division of Stockcube Research Ltd regulated by the FSA.